BEST PRACTICE AND TOURIST CAVE ENGINEERING
 A Waitomo "add on"
 

Van Watson
Black Water Rafting
Waitomo Caves, NZ


Introduction:

At the opening of this conference, both the Keynote Address and the resulting discussion identified Adventure Cave Tourism as a significant user of the Waitomo Karstfield.
We Adventure Tour operators are not cavers doing a lot of caving trips.
We are an industry which uses and impacts the karstfield.
We do modify caves for "mass" visitation.
As managers know, lots of clients mean 'tracks and toilets'; but, by cleverly dressing clients in wetsuits Adventure Operators are then freed up to concentrate on just 'tracks'.
Above ground tracks can be ripped out and revegetated to near original landscape condition within a healing period of 20 years or so.
Caves are not that simple.

Cave Engineering and Legal Cave Protection:

In these enlightened and cost conscious times we often hear that self regulation and less government or local council regulation is the way to more responsible and flexible development.  The examples of hydro dams in remote gorges, tunnels under the Alps and the New Zealand 36 stand rotary cowshed show that any engineering feat is possible.
A cave without legal protection relies on the conscience of the developer and the landowner.
At this time in New Zealand, when there is a property transaction on a 20 year old wooden house that needs to be structurally altered, the purchaser, the vendor, the banks, the builder and the adjoining landowners are all party to legal processes protecting individual and community 'rights'.
Conscience doesn't come into it.
All this time in New Zealand a million year old cave in a 25 million year old karstfield on freehold land relies on conscience for its 'rights’. Legal processes do not come into it.

But. What about the Resource Management Act?

Frankly, from here on the ground, you hear rumours that it's too hard and expensive to risk asking whether you should get a clearance from the mythical thing or not.  It's a bit like a sleeping crocodile, we know it's there but you would be crazy to wake it up if you were on your way for a swim.  It doesn't sound user friendly.

An Opinion on Cave Engineering (not legally binding)

The challenge in cave engineering is not just to surmount and subdue natural obstacles.  That's easy.  The challenge for we adventure tour operators is to realise that we are a current social pressure on a resource that operates on a geological timescale beyond our day to day comprehension.  This trendy adventure spending spree might fizzle out in either 8 or 167 years.  Can we put in structures or tracks that can protect the cave from our 'mass' visitation.  That's easy.  Can we pull all our gear and junk out and leave the cave in good order and condition for the twelfth generation after the next one.  That's a challenge.

List of Cave Engineering by Adventure Tour Operators.

 1. Dams.                                Ruakuri Cave
                                                Te Anaroa/Footwhistle Cave

 2. Wooden Stairs.                 Te Anaroa/Footwhistle Cave

 3. Galv Steel Stairs.             Ruakuri Cave

 4. Galv Steel Ladders.         Lost World
                                               Ringlefall Cave
                                               Kamutu Cave

 5. Take-off platforms.          Lost World
                                               Ruakuri Cave

 6. Galv Grating Walkway.   Ruakuri Cave

 7. Steps cut in Flowstone.    Kamutu Cave

 8. Steps in Sediment Bank  Kamutu Cave

 9. Concrete Plug (3.5cu.m)  Ruakuri Cave

10. New Entrances dug into significant Cave Systems by mechanical diggers 
 and fitted with concrete 'culvert' pipes.
                                              St Benedict's Caverns
                                              Ruakuri Cave

All this, by 3 operators in a ten year period. Imagine what 12 operators over 50 years could do.

Where to from here?

Before the 1997 ACKMA Conference disappears for two years I suggest a working party be formed to confer with Cave Landowners, Adventure Cave Tour Operators, the District Council, the Regional Council and Department of Conservation.  And from this; work towards all plans for cave engineering and modification to be overviewed by a panel consisting of-.

 Karst Officer                  Department of Conservation
 Planning Officer              Local District Council
 Consents Officer            Regional Council (Environment Waikato)
 Designated Rep             Australasian Cave & Karst Management Assoc.
 Designated Rep             New Zealand Speleological Society
and to investigate whether this can be a legal requirement under the existing Resource Management Act.  Yesterday would have been good, now it is imperative and tomorrow may be too late.
Best Practice can no longer be left as a 'conscience' process.
Contents